|
06-03-2014, 00:40
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: Excellent |
|
|
|
06-03-2014, 00:41
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: sound of music ( perfection ) |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2014, 10:07
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
SW Speed: High, SW Density: Average
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss ) Decoded Audio: Excellent |
|
|
|
|
09-03-2014, 00:21
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Ambient Conditions: Unknown as I wasn't planning on posting this log.
Decoded Audio: Fair |
|
|
|
|
09-03-2014, 00:22
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Ambient Conditions: Unknown as I wasn't planning on posting this log.
THIS POST IS NOT A DUPLICATE! Decoded Audio: Excellent |
|
|
|
|
10-03-2014, 00:56
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: Good Last edited by tpreitzel : 10-03-2014 at 01:02. |
|
|
|
|
11-03-2014, 00:16
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: Excellent |
|
|
|
|
12-03-2014, 01:42
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: sound of music ( perfection ) |
|
|
|
|
13-03-2014, 02:07
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
Decoded Audio: Excellent ... essentially perfection |
|
|
|
|
15-03-2014, 04:20
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
|
|
|
|
|
15-03-2014, 04:21
|
#41 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )
THIS POST IS NOT A DUPLICATE! |
|
|
|
|
18-03-2014, 08:03
|
#42 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
SW Speed: Average, SW Density: High
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss ) Decoded Audio: Excellent I suspect that if RNZI had adopted my suggestion in the thread for 13730 kHz on the same date as this particular broadcast on 11690 kHz, the percentage of decoding would have likely dropped to ~ 45% or so. However, the average SNR of this particular log is considerably lower than average for this broadcast so a much larger sample of logs would be necessary for an accurate determination. Last edited by tpreitzel : 18-03-2014 at 08:32. |
|
|
|
|
19-03-2014, 07:57
|
#43 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,033
|
SW Speed: Average, SW Density: Average
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss ) Decoded Audio: Excellent Except for a brief drop to a SNR of 14 dB, this particular broadcast would likely have been nearly as reliable using Mode A, MSC of 16 QAM, PL 1, and 17.9 kbps ... Last edited by tpreitzel : 19-03-2014 at 08:01. |
|
|
|
|
04-04-2014, 08:51
|
#44 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beauvais France JN19BL
Posts: 624
|
As usual nothing at all in DRM from RNZI for me.
One nice thing with them is the associated AM transmission 11725 in that case. And each time I tuned to them I could easily understand why DRM doesnt work A very unstable signal indeed |
|
|
|
|
04-04-2014, 09:14
|
#45 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Mount Fuji, Japan
Posts: 9,520
|
The Forum clock is out of order!
I just checked RNZI around 0740 UTC on 11690 kHz in DRM and all I get is some time and frame syncs. True, the AM signal 35 kHz up tells it all... all flutter. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
