DRM Software Radio Forums  

Go Back   DRM Software Radio Forums > DRM Software Radio - User Forums > Reception Results - Recent Posts
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-10-2018, 11:41   #151
mitajohn
Registered User
 
mitajohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Athens - Greece
Posts: 6,586
Oct_05

I got again that signal, very weak, no decoding, 5kHz BW, see the screenshot.
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670_20181005_mitajohn_INPUT_PSD.png (13.8 KB, 18 views)
__________________
Regards, John.
mitajohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2018, 14:33   #152
mitajohn
Registered User
 
mitajohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Athens - Greece
Posts: 6,586
Oct_05

A lot of Audio fragments during a 2 hours log, 7.9% CDA / 16.6dB max SNR. I heard some Engish and Italian.
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670_181005_1213_mitajohn.png (27.5 KB, 9 views)
File Type: png 15670-181005-1213-1413-mitajohn.png (38.4 KB, 16 views)
__________________
Regards, John.

Last edited by mitajohn : 05-10-2018 at 14:38.
mitajohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2018, 18:44   #153
AF4MP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,236
WINB audio versus WJHR

The WINB received audio bandwidth is less than 4kHz.

Sometime ago, in another thread, I argued that if the resultant decoded DRM audio is of such low fidelity, the broadcaster would probably do better by going with a SSB transmission.

This afternoon whilst listening to a KiwiSDR receiver (in the state of Maine) I came across the SSB 15555 kHz broadcast signal of WJHR from Milton, Florida.

It was interesting to subjectively compare the audio quality of these two broadcasts. Although they both had similar religious programs, the audio received from WJHR was a lot clearer than that of WINB (and with no drop outs)!

I am unable, usually, to receive the WJHR transmission as my location is too close to their transmitter.

According to the HFCC WJHR beams almost due north at 5 degrees with a power of 50 kW to a log periodic antenna. Judging from the signal strength they are probably running far less than the published power output.

I managed to receive WJHR on several KiwSDR receivers in Europe.
__________________
73,

-Zyg- AF4MP
3402' N, 8424' W
EM74ta
AF4MP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2018, 19:46   #154
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 5th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181005-1200-1700-TPR.png (46.4 KB, 8 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 17:57   #155
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 8th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181008-1620-1650-TPR.png (36.4 KB, 7 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 17:59   #156
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 9th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181009-1443-1459-TPR.png (39.9 KB, 7 views)
File Type: png 15670-181009-1603-1700-TPR.png (40.7 KB, 8 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 03:11   #157
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 10th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181010-1300-1700-TPR.png (42.4 KB, 11 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 18:59   #158
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 11th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181011-1623-1658-TPR.png (39.0 KB, 7 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2018, 18:46   #159
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,242
Oct 12th, 2018 partial log ...

Frequency: +
Codec: -
Modulation: -
Attached Images
File Type: png 15670-181012-1303-1700-TPR.png (43.3 KB, 11 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-10-2018, 16:01   #160
G4TMV
Registered User
 
G4TMV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: East Lancashire, north west England
Posts: 135
The signal is unusually good this afternoon (October 14th), and I think I've logged more audio from it today than ever before. Will it hold up for Wavescan? somehow I doubt it, but we can but hope. I'll just have to endure the bible bashers and huxters until then!

No 'data' to be seen on the signal today though.
__________________
Alan.


Lancashire, UK
53:39.18N 02:10.28W
IO83vp

http://www.ndblist.info
G4TMV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:09.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.